The content management ecosystem changed a lot in the last two years. Webflow, Framer, Payload, Astro — each has its place.
WordPress is still the most widely used CMS in the world. It is also the most hacked, the one that needs the most plugins to do basic things and the one with the worst performance by default. That does not mean it is a bad choice — it means that in 2026 it has more serious competition than ever, and for many projects it is no longer the obvious answer.
The change that happened between 2024 and 2026
Webflow and Framer matured to the point of being real options for corporate websites without needing code. Astro became the preferred choice for projects with lots of content and demanding SEO requirements. Payload CMS grew as an option for custom projects where you need a flexible admin panel without building it from scratch. And WordPress maintained its share but lost ground on new projects where the team has options.
WordPress: when it still makes sense
If you have been using WordPress for years and your team manages it fluently, switching has a real migration and training cost that needs to be justified. If you have a blog with 500 well-ranked historical articles, moving them without losing SEO is a project in itself. If your business depends on a very specific plugin from the WP ecosystem that has no equivalent on other platforms, the opportunity cost of leaving is high.
The signal that it is time to consider an alternative: more than 30 active plugins, loading time over 3 seconds, and more than €800 spent in the last year on updates, security patches or hack recovery.
Webflow: codeless design with full control
Webflow is the most mature option for corporate and marketing websites where design is critical and you want the client to be able to edit content without touching code. The integrated CMS is intuitive, hosting is included and performance is good by default.
The downside is the cost (from €23/month for CMS sites) and the learning curve if you come from WordPress. And for projects with complex business logic or integrations with external systems, it has limits that can only be overcome with custom code.
Astro: the best option for content and SEO
If your website has a lot of content (blog, documentation, landing pages for each service or location) and SEO is a priority, Astro is the most efficient architecture available today. It generates static HTML by default, which means very low loading times and a Lighthouse score that reaches 100 without effort.
Astro's content collections system allows you to manage articles in Markdown or MDX files, with strict typing and without needing a database for static content. For a blog with 200 articles that needs to load fast and rank well, it is hard to find anything better.
Payload CMS: the custom admin panel
Payload is an open source headless CMS built on Next.js that automatically generates an admin panel based on the data schema you define. It is what we use at Codelvia for projects where the client needs to manage complex content (services, product listings, portfolio projects) without us having to build the admin from scratch.
It requires more technical knowledge to configure, but the result is a CMS completely tailored to the project's needs, without the limits of a third-party platform.
How to choose
For a corporate website with little dynamic content and a tight budget: Webflow or WordPress with a good theme. For a blog or content-heavy SEO site: Astro. For a project with complex custom content management: Payload + Next.js. For a web app with business logic: Next.js without a generic CMS.
What we no longer recommend as a first option: WordPress with 20+ plugins for new projects where the team is starting out. Not because WordPress is bad, but because there are faster, more secure and easier to maintain options for those cases.
Have a project in mind?
Tell us what you want to achieve.